Anything Goes Discussions

Icon

News, Tips, Tricks

What to Do When IE Blocks a needed ActiveX

I recently was setting up port forwarding for a DVR at a business. They wanted to watch the DVR from a remote location and port forwarding with password protection was the easiest solution. Once I had the port forwarding set up on the router I set out to the remote site to set up the URL for the remote computer. What I encountered was an IE security error message that blocked the installation of the remoteweb.cab ActiveX.

What I first did was lower my security setting so that all ActiveX would be allowed and tried again without any success. I then put the URL in the Trusted sites and tried again only to fail. At this point I went to Google and found a couple of MS MVP’s that had left someone with the same problem some snotty answers. There was one intelligent answer from a MCSE but it was the first solution that I had tried.

Bound to not let this kick me for more than 15 minutes, I decided to lower the settings in the Trusted Sites to the lowest settings I could. I went back to the site, where low and behold the install worked perfectly. After it was finished and I could see the DVR, I went about moving the security settings in both the Tools > Security > Internet and Trusted Sites back to their normal settings.

internet-options

My last check was to restart IE and test the port forwarding site again, which was a smashing success. What this shows is that you shouldn’t listen to titles like “MS MVP” or “MCSE” as gospel. You can get good answers in all sorts of places, you can even find them yourself with a little persistence.

Filed under: Computer Industry, Computer Security, Internet Explorer, Networking , , , , ,

Firefox fixes Windows URI bug in less than a month

As I was browsing the web tonight, my Firefox automatically updated to 2.0.0.6. After I clicked restart, I went to the Firefox release notes to see what was fixed. I was especially interested in seeing if Mozilla had fixed the URI bug that IE7 causes and is also a Windows API problem.

Well, yes it is covered in this update. You can read about it in the Release Notes

Is Microsoft watching?

A bug fixed in less than a month that really is still a Windows bug and still affects IE7. Way to go Mozilla!

If you like this post, then subscribe to my feed Powered by FeedBurner

Technorati tags: , , , ,

Filed under: Internet Explorer , , , ,

IE, Vista & Perception

I read a lot of online articles, blogs and technical papers, while I also work with Windows, Linux and OS X on a daily basis. A lot has recently been written about in a negative light about the perception of IE 7 and how it will affect Vista. A majority of this negative press has come from the folks at Ziff Davis, mostly eWeek and Microsoft Watch. The links take you straight to two of the articles and authors I’m talking about.

What gets to me is that both of these articles contain one sided and even misleading facts slanted against Microsoft. While I don’t always agree with the positions of Microsoft and will state my case one way or the other, I always will present both sides if someone wants to comment about it. Here are both sides of this issue from their perspective and mine own experiences:

Their side on the Automatic update of IE 7:

Whether or not there is an installation notification is irrelevant, I think. The perception that there is no notification–that the end user had no choice–is what matters more.

Source: Microsoft Watch – Web Services & Browser – Will IE 7 Perception Problems Hurt Vista?

Microsoft used the January 2007 security update to induce users to try Internet Explorer 7.0 whether they wanted to or not. But after discovering they had been involuntarily upgraded to the new browser, they next found that application incompatibility effectively cut them off from the Internet.

Source: Monthly Microsoft Patch Hides Tricky IE 7 Download

The other side, which I am on:

Today’s case in point is from Joe Wilcox, who took over Microsoft Watch from Mary Jo Foley a few months ago. In a muddled mess of a column about IE7, Joe includes this quote from a reader:

“IE 7 is horrible!” said Mark Brugler. The browser “crashed every time I tried to watch a video.” The technical director for a theatre in Tucson, Ariz. complained that he “didn’t like the fact that [IE 7] was forced upon me via Microsoft updates and I was not given the choice to install it.”

The reason this jumped out at me is I’ve been rebuilding PCs this week and I’ve run into the IE7 installation via Windows Update and Microsoft Update not once but twice. Joe’s reader is, to put it charitably, wrong. IE7 is not – indeed, cannot be – installed without the user’s explicit consent. In fact, there are three separate places where you have to provide that consent, or the installation fails.
Source: More fact-free journalism | Ed Bott’s Windows Expertise |

And my perception:

Automatic updates have been around for a long time. They are able to be customized and if you are running a network server, you can change group policies for all your users in less than 5 minutes. You can also use you own Windows Software Update Server to push what updates you want.

Microsoft hasn’t hidden the IE 7 update, and it’s not even a Critical update (update 1/25, it’s actually a high priority update but optional to install). It’s an Optional software update, that has been said above contains 3 dialogs you have to agree to before it will actually install. That is the same with the Automatic, Express and Custom updates settings.

Furthermore, if you do a Custom update you have the option to uncheck the download and read the information about IE 7 and check not to show the update again. This choice actually hides it and never downloads it unless you change the settings and show the update again. Lastly, Microsoft even has an IE blocker script you can download and use to change your registry to block the IE download completely.

Their is no perception that you have to download it, none whatsoever. The only reason to feel like you should download it is that you don’t read or aren’t completely informed on the download. Nowhere in update documentation does it say that if you don’t download IE 7 your computer will explode or never run again.

There are many more people who administer windows networks that actually understand the process and know how to manage a rollout or just the simple task of setting group policies for automatic updates. There are also many average users that know how to read the installation prompts without being a zombie. You can’t blame the messenger if the recipient can’t take the time to read or say no before kicking the tires by getting more information.

It is a proven fact that people with a problem are more likely to speak out than someone that doesn’t have a problem with the same issue.

I’ve downloaded IE 7 on my home systems without a problem. It works on an XP system & my Vista laptop. At work we have tested it and have come to the conclusion that it does not work correctly with a few of our other pieces of software that use IE, so we have blocked it’s download until the other programs update themselves to run with IE 7.

Technorati tags: , , , ,

Filed under: Internet, Internet Explorer, Microsoft, Technology , , , ,

Firefox 2.0 to Release October 24th

As I’ve seen printed in a few different places Firefox 2.0 is to be released on Tuesday October 24th (PC World). Normally, I beta test a few different programs, but with this release of Firefox I waited until yesterday to install RC3 on my production machine. The reason behind this is because of the Firefox extension compatibility problems in beta’s. The early beta’s and RC’s usually break a lot of extensions and it’s not worth the testing of minor features to kill my user experience. As of today, only one extension out of sixteen was broke when I installed RC3. That’s worth the wait on my production machine.

I do run a few virtual machines, so I have been testing Firefox for a while. Each VM runs different app’s, one does configuration testing for work, the other does beta testing of programs such as Firefox. As the beta’s and RC’s have progressed I’ve added my extensions to see which ones would work and which ones wouldn’t. By October 1st I felt comfortable with installing 2.0 on my production system, but just wanted to see when the extensions would get to under 5 broken. That happened early this past week and by the time I got around to installing 2.0 on my primary machine it was down to the one. The extension that is broken is Tabbrowser Preferences 1.2.8.9, which hasn’t been updated since April 2006. Blog This for Live Writer, which is not a Firefox extension, but a Microsoft extension for Firefox is broken also, but I don’t count it because I would expect that to be broken.

So if you feel up to it, I suggest that you go ahead and update today using RC3. You won’t be disappointed.

Filed under: Computer Software, Internet, Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox , , , , , ,

Microsoft Playing With Double Edged Security Sword

Lately I’ve been reading the complaints from Symantec and McAfee that Microsoft is blocking them out of the Windows Vista kernel. Now, most complaints from end users and security experts are that Windows has been poorly written with security in mind, but when they start adding security they are hit by companies that have built a living off that poor programming. I have to say that I’ve used both companies products in the past, but wouldn’t use them unless I have to.

From my vantage point on the one side of the sword is, I’d rather have an OS that is secure and not have to worry about buying 3rd party products. If it takes securing the Windows kernel, so be it. You know we need to throw this antitrust bull out the window (no pun intended). True, MS has used uncompetitive practices in OEM dealings and needs to be punished for that, but a lot these complaints and lawsuits are just companies picking on the big guy. Let MS make an OS that is secure and let them be. Don’t make them make the OS insecure because you have companies that have been making money from those insecurities and see their cash cow drying up.

Now on the other side of the sword, MS always jumps into something and then lets it slide because the are have no competition, which isn’t a good thing either. Some good examples are Internet Explorer and Windows itself. They become the leader because they are behind in development or have a real good competitor. They work really hard to come up with a great product and once they crush that competition they slack off. Look at what FireFox did to them, it caused them to finally get it in gear to create IE 7. To go back and create a new version of IE that actually is a step forward instead of a creep like a snail. Windows was in direct response to Apple’s GUI. Windows is a knock off of the Apple GUI no matter how many different ways you spin it and I’ve heard them all. In the beginning it was a very poor knock off, but it got more play because Apple didn’t open their system and IBM did to make clones. So Windows thrives, crushes Apple in OS market and sits on it’s laurels to make an insecure OS that it is just now playing catch up with Vista. It’s really bad when MS is the OS leader and the OS X is the better overall OS.

What will Microsoft do with Vista and it’s security? Windows Defender, UAC, Protected mode in IE….will they all be good for a little while and then when the competition dies will they stop innovating or will they become a company that learns from previous mistakes? Will they continue to make improvements, will they be proactive instead of reactive?

These are questions I don’t have an answer for, but I do have a saying that is appropriate, “He who does not learn about his past is bound to make the same mistakes in the future”.

That’s what I think….What about you?

Filed under: Apple Computers, Computer Industry, Computer Software, Internet, Internet Explorer, Microsoft, Mozilla Firefox, Technology , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Legal Stuff

Anything Goes Discussions
Copyright © 2006 - 2009
Ray Ebersole

The Other Pages of Anything Goes Discussions

Subscribe

Add to Google


Add to My Yahoo!


Add to Technorati Favorites



Page Views

  • 261,614 views

Anything Delicious